District Court Cases in Texas
Cases 21 - 30 of 441,480
Stewart v. Meridian Security Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Nicole Stewart
Defendant:
Meridian Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Preston Hollow Community Capital v. Harris et al
as 5:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Preston Hollow Community Capital
Defendant:
R. Lee Harris and Robert E. Esrey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Ruff v. McCulloch et al
as 7:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Malcolm D Ruff
Defendant:
Robin McCulloch, Lori Hodgkins, Atticus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry et al v. State Farm Lloyds
as 1:2024cv00162
Plaintiff:
James Terry and Tryla Terry
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Hayes v. Carmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Hayes, Jr
Defendant:
Carmart, Inc. doing business as Carmart of Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00413
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Thomas C. Baker
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banks v. Warden-FCI Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Danny Lee Banks
Respondent:
Warden-FCI Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
