US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,338
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Sattler Tech Corporation d/b/a Wali Electric v. Lyu et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Plaintiff:
Sattler Tech Corporation d/b/a Wali Electric
Defendant:
Yaqi Lyu, Ningbo Kairui Zhaozhi Trading Company Ltd., U.S. Patent No. D853,403 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Sattler Tech Corporation d/b/a Wali Electric v. Lyu et al
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Sattler Tech Corporation d/b/a Wali Electric and Sattler Tech Corporation doing business as Wali Electric, a California Corporation
Defendant:
Yaqi Lyu, Ningbo Kairui Zhaozhi Trading Company Ltd., U.S. Patent No. D853,403 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Sattler Tech Corporation d/b/a Wali Electric v. Lyu et al
as 3:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Sattler Tech Corporation d/b/a Wali Electric
Defendant:
Yaqi Lyu, Ningbo Kairui Zhaozhi Trading Company Ltd., U.S. Patent No. D853,403 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Counter Claimant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ridgeview IP LLC v. Anthology Inc.
as 1:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Ridgeview IP LLC
Defendant:
Anthology Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 281 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
