US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,321
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01569
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Thousand Oaks Barrel Co., LLC v. The Partnerships, Companies, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv01563
Plaintiff: Thousand Oaks Barrel Co., LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships, Companies, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Digital Distillery LLC and Guizhou Wei Shi Ke Ji You Xian Gong Si (dba Kovize)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Thousand Oaks Barrel Co., LLC v. The Partnerships, etc.
as 2:2023cv00579
Plaintiff: Thousand Oaks Barrel Co., LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships, Companies, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Thousand Oaks Barrel Co., LLC v. The Partnerships, etc.
as 1:2023cv01560
Plaintiff: Thousand Oaks Barrel Co., LLC
Defendant: The Partnerships, Companies, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. et al v. CureVac SE
as 3:2023cv00764
Plaintiff: Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Michael Hope, Ying Tam and others
Defendant: CureVac SE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 256 Patent Non-Infringement
Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc. et al v. CureVac SE
as 2:2023cv00567
Plaintiff: Acuitas Therapeutics, Inc., Ying Tam, Paulo Lin and others
Defendant: Michael Hope and CureVac SE
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 256 Patent Non-Infringement
Reid v. United States Patent and Trademark Office
as 1:2023cv01544
Plaintiff: Mark D Reid
Defendant: United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01532
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01497
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd et al v. Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.
as 1:2023cv01488
Plaintiff: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Defendant: Datang Mobile Communications Equipment Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?