US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,319
Hessing-Roper v. Commissioner for Patents et al
as 1:2023cv01453
Plaintiff: Peter Christian Hessing-Roper
Defendant: Commissioner for Patents, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Reginald Tillman, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Garvin v. Bode Technology et al
as 1:2023cv01352
Plaintiff: Alex Garvin
Defendant: Bode Technology and Laboratory Corp of America Holdings (Lab Corp)
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
LifeNet Health v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00479
Plaintiff: LifeNet Health
Defendant: Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. and Embody, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Guymon v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff: John Lewis Guymon, Jr
Defendant: Kathi Vidal
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Locke v. Under Secretary of Commerce of Intellectual Property et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv01288
Plaintiff: Wendell Terry Locke
Defendant: Under Secretary of Commerce of Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
MCS Industries, Inc. v. Mirrotek, LLC
as 2:2023cv00463
Plaintiff: MCS Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Mirrotek, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MCS Industries, Inc. v. Mirrotek, LLC
as 1:2023cv01265
Plaintiff: MCS Industries, Inc.
Defendant: Mirrotek, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
H. Lundbeck A/S v. United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
as 1:2023cv01105
Plaintiff: H. Lundbeck A/S
Defendant: Kathi Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 154 AIA Appeal of Patent Term Adjustment Determination
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2023cv01043
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?