US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 19,556
Brown v. Clarke et al
as 1:2022cv01122
Plaintiff: Demmerick E. Brown and Denrick Eric Brown
Defendant: Harold W Clarke, David A. Robinson, George M Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frye v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00655
Plaintiff: Devon Frye
Defendant: Nelson Smith, Dr. William McKenna, Dr. Daniel Mondaldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. USA
as 1:2022cv01124
Plaintiff: Felton Earl Harris
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Porter v. Phelps We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01123
Petitioner: Marcus Porter and Marcus M Porter
Respondent: Warden Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
Campbell v. USA
as 3:2022cv00651
Petitioner: John Campbell
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Duodu v. Clarke
as 2:2022cv00410
Petitioner: Kenneth Oteng Duodu
Respondent: Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barrera-Pineda v. Leu
as 2:2022cv00411
Petitioner: Oscar Orlando Barrera-Pineda
Respondent: D. Leu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Crummie v. Williamsburg-Jaimes City Gen Dist.
as 2:2022cv00413
Petitioner: Curtis Sebastian Crummie
Respondent: Williamsburg-James City Gen Dist.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dandridge v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00647
Petitioner: Victor M. Dandridge, III
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
George v. USA
as 4:2022cv00099
Petitioner: Lindsay Nathaniel George
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?