US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 6,981
Bell v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Steven Bell
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croom v. Anwari 656 et al
as 1:2024cv01386
Plaintiff:
Derek T. Croom
Defendant:
Corporal Roberson, VCU Medical Center, Anwari 656 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lomax v. Bullard et al
as 1:2024cv01387
Defendant:
Marshall Young, Colette McEachin, Jessica Bourne and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Ross Lomax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Southwest Regional Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Amy Nicole Smith
Defendant:
Southwest Regional Jail, Fluvanna Correction Center and Goochland Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Varner v. Leu et al
as 3:2024cv00566
Defendant:
Warden Leu, Captain Rosencrance, Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
v. Thurston et al
as 3:2024cv00568
Defendant:
Michael Thurston and Henrico Doctors Hospital Parham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Santos et al
as 1:2024cv01388
Plaintiff:
Karsten Obed Allen
Defendant:
F. Santos, Ms. Adams, J. Gloss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Clarke et al
as 2:2024cv00479
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
T. Watkins and C. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walters v. RRJ Security Staff
as 2:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
Russell Walters
Defendant:
RRJ Security Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Louis Ray Chapman, Jr.
Defendant:
Global Experts and Outsourcing Inc., C Lipscomb, S. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
