US District Court for the Western District of Virginia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,225
Miller El v. Derosha
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller El
Defendant:
T. R. Derosha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Abdelbaki v. Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Alaeldin Abdelbaki
Defendant:
Rectors and Visitors of the University of Virginia, Ken Ono, Jim Rolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00813
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Mogensen et al v. Welch
as 6:2023cv00077
Plaintiff:
Deborah Mogensen and Karl Mogensen
Defendant:
Michelle Welch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Long v. March et al
as 7:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Debra Long
Defendant:
Marie March and Big Bear Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
