Virginia Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,337
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00675
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Gesture Technology Partners, LLC v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00622
Plaintiff: Gesture Technology Partners, LLC
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Domo Tactical Communications (DTC) Ltd.
as 1:2022cv00609
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant: Domo Tactical Communications (DTC) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Domo Tactical Communications (DTC) Ltd.
as 2:2022cv00240
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant: Domo Tactical Communications (DTC) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00588
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00504
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Axxonsoft US, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00452
Plaintiff: Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant: Axxonsoft US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00448
Plaintiff: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2022cv00447
Counter Defendant: Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant: Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. Ace Hardware Corporation
as 3:2022cv00271
Plaintiff: Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Ace Hardware Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?