Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 9,120
Brown v. Bowles
as 1:2024cv00372
Petitioner:
James L. Brown
Respondent:
K. Bowles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salahuddin v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00146
Petitioner:
Khalil A. Salahuddin
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00139
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Virginia Commonwealth of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Unknown
as 1:2024cv00350
Petitioner:
Shawn White
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. White
as 2:2024cv00140
Petitioner:
Wayne Alexander Jackson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rick White and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yeverton v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Rashauwn X. Yeverton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Unknown
as 7:2024cv00160
Petitioner:
Shawn White
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez-Navarro v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2024cv00154
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez-Navarro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Sol D. Burke
Respondent:
Unknown and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sprouse v. VA Director of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00327
Petitioner:
Derek Sprouse
Respondent:
VA Director of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
