Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 9,122
Delgadillo v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Calderon Delgadillo
Defendant:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00101
Petitioner:
Isaiah Lewis
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Al-Shabazz v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
J.C. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Keller v. Dotson
as 2:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Micahel Wayne Keller
Respondent:
Chadwick S. Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Dotson
as 3:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Joseph Anthony Daniels
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Spiker, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
George H. Spiker, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sikandar v. 20th Judicial District of Virginia, et al.
as 3:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Raza Sikandar
Respondent:
20th Judicial District of Virginia, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Streeval
as 7:2024cv00099
Petitioner:
Christopher Joseph Atkins
Respondent:
Warden J. Streeval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
John Robert Martin, Jr.
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
