Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,376
Binns v. Coles et al
as 2:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Gregory Binns
Defendant:
SGT. Coles, LT. Riggsby, K9 Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Andrew Ash
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mickens v. Henrico County Sheriff Department
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Tyshawn Mickens
Defendant:
Henrico County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mouring v. Daniels et al
as 2:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Layne Mouring
Defendant:
Captain Daniels, Captain Jones, Lieutenant Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Staff of WRSP et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Thad Gilbert Cooper
Defendant:
Staff of WRSP, Med Team, C.O. Kenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Government of the Virgin Islands et al
as 7:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Cecil Francis
Defendant:
Government of the Virgin Islands, B. Davis, Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Medical Unit et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Medical Unit, Officer Freeman and Sgt Copeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Richmond City Justice Center et al
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Campbell
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center, Officer Tylor and Officer Mertaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kearney v. Mangrum et al
as 2:2024cv00098
Plaintiff:
Lerico Kearney
Defendant:
Mangrum and Warner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trotman v. Park et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
David Michael Trotman
Defendant:
Doctor Park, Doctor Henderson, J. Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
