US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 931
Lopez Carrillo v. Bennett
as 2:2022cv00296
Petitioner:
Jose Mario Lopez Carrillo
Respondent:
State of Washington and Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinlan v. Ferguson
as 4:2022cv05143
Petitioner:
Terrance Joe Quinlan
Respondent:
Robert W Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Campbell v. Carpenter
as 1:2022cv03160
Petitioner:
Glenn James Campbell and Glenn James Mollett
Respondent:
Eric Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Person v. State of Washington
as 4:2022cv05129
Petitioner:
Anthony Shrone Person
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Sparber
as 2:2022cv00238
Petitioner:
Luis Andre Perez and Andre Perez
Respondent:
State of Washington and Michael Sparber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beckham v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2022cv00231
Petitioner:
Rashad Beckham
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Beckham v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2022cv00230
Petitioner:
Rashad Beckham
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Headrick v. Strange
as 2:2022cv00226
Petitioner:
John Griffin Headrick
Respondent:
Cheryl Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hawkins v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2022cv00225
Defendant:
Jonathan Brooks Hawkins
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Carpenter
as 4:2022cv05126
Petitioner:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Respondent:
Eric Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
