Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,299
Ollivier v. Devos
as 2:2024cv01092
Respondent:
Keith Devos
Petitioner:
Brandon Ollivier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sibley v. State of Washington
as 2:2024cv00244
Petitioner:
Teddy Roosevelt Sibley
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carballo v. State of Washington
as 3:2024cv05576
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Cesar Chicas Carballo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05573
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Bret William Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rotchford v. State: King County Pros
as 3:2024cv05569
Petitioner:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Respondent:
State, King County Pros
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rotchford v. State: King County Pros
as 2:2024cv00236
Respondent:
State: King County Pros
Petitioner:
Fraser McDonough Rotchford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garvie v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01017
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Petitioner:
Eugene Brian Garvie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Midkiff v. Bennett
as 3:2024cv05550
Petitioner:
Byron Glen Midkiff, Jr
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv01002
Petitioner:
Bobby Colbert
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of Washington
as 3:2024cv05542
Petitioner:
Christopher Johnson
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
