Washington Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 4,252
Rowe v. Andrewjeski et al
as 3:2023cv05875
Plaintiff:
Timothy Peter Joseph Rowe
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski and Bob Ferguson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lei v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01505
Petitioner:
Wobiao Lei
Respondent:
Howard C Barron and Colette S Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fakih v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01442
Petitioner:
Abdallah Fakih
Respondent:
H. Barron and C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cuevas v. Carpenter
as 2:2023cv00265
Petitioner:
Moses Joseph Cuevas
Respondent:
Eric Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garver v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv01429
Petitioner:
Anthony Garver
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parviz v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01407
Petitioner:
Mahsa Parviz
Respondent:
H Barron and C Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Schmitt v. Barron
as 2:2023cv01398
Petitioner:
Jacob Ivan Schmitt
Respondent:
Howard C Barron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Allah v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05808
Petitioner:
Allah
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garver v. State of Washington
as 2:2023cv00259
Petitioner:
Anthony Garver
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
