Washington Labor Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 403
Hallman v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv01190
Plaintiff:
Rich Hallman
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Goldstine v. FedEx Freight, Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01164
Defendant:
Corporation(s) XYZ 1-100, Doe(s) 1-100, FedEx Freight, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David Goldstine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martin v. Bezos
as 2:2018cv01077
Defendant:
Jeffrey Preston Bezos
Plaintiff:
La'Tasha Trenease Martin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Yarte v. CHHJ Seattle, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01033
Defendant:
Magnus Olason, Karin Olason, CHHJ Seattle and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Yarte
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4323
Johnson v. Assisted Living Concepts, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv05549
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Johnson
Defendant:
Enlivant Aid Mgmt, LLC, Upreit Aid Co., LLC and Assisted Living Concepts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2018cv01001
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Johnson
Defendant:
Upreit Aid Co., LLC, Enlivant Aid Management, LLC and Assisted Living Concepts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall II v. Bechtel National, Inc.
as 4:2018cv05112
Defendant:
Bechtel National Inc
Plaintiff:
Curtis W Hall II and Curtis W Hall, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kingzett v. Nisbet Oyster Co, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv05526
Defendant:
David H Nisbet, Nisbet Oyster Co, David Nisbet and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Kingzett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Winn v. Tinsley
as 2:2018cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Winn
Defendant:
Boyd Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wagemann v. US Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board
as 2:2018cv00153
Defendant:
US Department of Labor Employees Compensation Appeals Board
Plaintiff:
Kris P Wagemann and Corp for National & Community Service AmeriCorps Vista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
