US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 3,061
Lewis v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00213
Petitioner:
Mario Ambrosio Lewis
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00211
Petitioner:
Mr. Charles E. Williams
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Solorzano v. Lovett
as 3:2023cv00152
Petitioner:
Julio Solorzano
Respondent:
Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
Antwan Williams
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Ray
as 5:2023cv00209
Petitioner:
Segundo Tarquino Guero Garcia and Segundo Tarquino Cuero Garcia
Respondent:
H. L. Ray and Heather L. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00206
Petitioner:
Jay Smith
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00205
Petitioner:
Brad Reed
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Diaz v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00204
Petitioner:
Jonathan C. Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hawkins v. United States of America et al
as 3:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
Jalisa Lashae Hawkins
Respondent:
United States of America and Matthew Scott Delligatti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharp v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00138
Petitioner:
Robert Carl Sharp
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
