US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,688
v. Johnson et al
as 5:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Keith Dimitri Johnson
Defendant:
Mr. Merrick Garland, Mrs. C. S. Peters, Mr. C. Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
John Doe, Mr. Blanks, Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Damron v. Rays et al
as 3:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jonathon Thomas Damron
Defendant:
H. Rays, A. Messenger, Oslin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mott v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mr. Nathan Mott and Carl Lynch
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Assistant Warden John Doe, Mr. Blanks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Potts v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Alexander Potts
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wable
as 3:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charles Raymond Wable
Defendant:
NCRJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Todd G. Dean
Defendant:
Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
O'Brien v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00121
Petitioner:
William O'Brien
Respondent:
Ms. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bowers v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jessica B. Bowers
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Department of Homeland Security, Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Chafin v. Gier et al
as 3:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Chafin
Defendant:
Brandon Gier, Cpl. Craig, Jason Hutson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
