US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 141 - 150 of 1,688
Campos v. Brown
as 5:2022cv00248
Petitioner:
Elver Manuel Campos
Respondent:
Acting Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ritchey v. Sayre et al
as 5:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Francie Irvin Ritchey
Defendant:
D.T. Sayre, Elkins Police Department and Chief T. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leon v. Warden
as 5:2022cv00243
Petitioner:
Nestor Leon
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hedrick v. Jivden et al
as 3:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
Betsy Jivden, John Anderson, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clinton v. Chumley
as 5:2022cv00241
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Sgt. S S Chumley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Mucciola et al
as 5:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Brian M. Stewart
Defendant:
Gabrielle E. Mucciola, Judge Tucker, Morgantown WV Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knotts v. Bailey
as 5:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Zachary Knotts
Defendant:
Honorable Jennifer Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephens v. Sanders et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Evon Stephens
Defendant:
Lt. Sanders and Captain Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cook, Jr. v. Lanham et al
as 5:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cook, Jr.
Defendant:
B. Kelly Lanham and Aaron Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Reichard et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Brian Stewart
Defendant:
Timothy Reichard, Michele Stewart, Rodney Alan Stewart, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
