US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 191 - 200 of 1,688
Hoover v. Corbin et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Hoover
Defendant:
Patricia D. Corbin, Christopher Meyer, Ellen Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hurt v. Tate
as 5:2022cv00043
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Hurt
Defendant:
D. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Weaver
as 5:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Smith
Defendant:
RN Weaver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jacques v. Daughrety
as 3:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Patrick Jacques
Defendant:
Co. Daughrety
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kimp v. Nowakowski et al
as 5:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Timmy Jerome Kimp
Defendant:
Dr. Bonnie Nowakowski and Warden Russell Heisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Miller v. Gordon
as 3:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Amanda Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lucas v. RSAT Program/Jail Post Office et al
as 3:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
James T. Lucas
Defendant:
RSAT Program/Jail Post Office, RSAT Program Director, St. Mary Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Ruby University Hospital et al
as 5:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Joenell Rice
Defendant:
Ruby University Hospital, Hazelton USP and Hazelton Medical
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
VanHoose v. Straughn et al
as 3:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Merdith VanHoose
Defendant:
Shawn Straughn and Ryan Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jenkins et al
as 5:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Jones
Defendant:
Lt. Jenkins, C. Ord, H. Burkett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
