US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,946
Coleman v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00527
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner:
Kavanaugh Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cross v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00525
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Tamika R. Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Curry-Wilson v. Lefever
as 1:2024cv00516
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Lashaun Curry-Wilson
Respondent:
Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Price v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00517
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Petitioner:
Jacklyn Jatrice Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Rowena Joyce Scott
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Casillas v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00519
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden
Petitioner:
David Casillas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Hodge v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Cordero L. Hodge
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bynum v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00507
Respondent:
Mr. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Malcolm Bynum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones v. Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
as 5:2024cv00505
Petitioner:
Charles W. Jones
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Becley (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Mason v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00502
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Petitioner:
Ernest Jerome Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
