US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 9,409
Kurkowski v. Spafford et al
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Patrick R Kurkowski
Defendant:
Austin Spafford, Tanner Pardun, Officer Magnun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Eiklane
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
James D Green
Defendant:
Tricia Eiklane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Bureau of Health Services et al
as 2:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Dionny L Reynolds
Defendant:
Bureau of Health Services, Ashley Haseleu, Tonya Wesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Ronell Hart
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, State of Wisconsin, Dr Jenna Niess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Ludwig et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Oscar Raymond Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Julie Ludwig and Wendy Mohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingers v. Suter
as 2:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Dean J Wingers
Respondent:
Christine Suter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gardner v. DeHann
as 2:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Pierre Gardner and Pierre Douglas Gardner
Respondent:
Sue DeHann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess v. Etsinger et al
as 2:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hess
Defendant:
Sergeant Etsinger, Sergeant Crochiere, Sgt Etsinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
London De'shawn Neal
Defendant:
Lt Marcus King and Lt Anthony Matushak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
