US District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 171 - 180 of 9,409
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warner v. Racine County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Kyle Warner
Defendant:
Racine County Jail, Racine County Jail Medical Staff and Racine County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Johnson
as 2:2024cv00180
Petitioner:
Tyrone Davis Smith
Respondent:
Steven Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00161
Petitioner:
Demoyne Davis
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singh v. Eplett
as 2:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
Arshpreet Singh
Respondent:
Cheryl Eplett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00162
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Wilson v. Thoresons et al
as 2:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Trivon Devele Wilson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Division of Adult Institutions, Milwaukee House of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. Carr et al
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Anthony V Cordova
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Sarah Cooper, Randall Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Whitman et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Justin M Baldwin
Defendant:
Candace Whitman, Drew Delforge and Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
