Wisconsin Social Security Cases

Retirement and Survivors Benefits Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 131 - 140 of 340
Broehm v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01186
Plaintiff: Randy J Broehm
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nelson v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01172
Plaintiff: Chanel Enjolique Nelson
Defendant: Nancy A Berryhill and Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kozomara v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00955
Plaintiff: Jasmina Kozomara
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Petrie v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00941
Plaintiff: Codie E Petrie
Defendant: Andrew M Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Tunis v. Saul
as 1:2019cv00899
Plaintiff: James Tunis
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harris-Patterson, Laura v. Saul, Andrew We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00487
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff: Laura A. Harris-Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Halliday v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00862
Plaintiff: Sheri Halliday
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hoppa v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00848
Plaintiff: John D Hoppa
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Struck, Joel v. Berryhill, Nancy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv00449
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff: Joel R. Struck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jester v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00793
Defendant: Acting Commissioner Nancy A. Berryhill and Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff: Bennett Jester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?