Irvin v. Adams et al
| Charlie Irvin |
| Adams, Baker and Smith |
| 4:2022cv00476 |
| May 20, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (llg) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #3 Order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/12/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER dismissing, without prejudice, #1 Irvin's Complaint for failure to comply with Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and failure to respond to the Court's orders. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/12/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 2
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS directing the Clerk of Court to to enclose an IFP application along with a copy of this order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying certificate and calculation sheet, or pay the $402.00 filing and administrative fees within 30 days of the date of this order. Otherwise, the lawsuit will be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 05/23/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Charlie Irvin. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
