Roberts v. Graves et al
| Brunson Roberts |
| Solomon Graves, Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Joe Page, Lewis Young, Antoine Tyson, Jada Lawarence, Keith Waddle, Harvey Light, Amplo, Odom, Jasminia Morlton, Janice Blake, Calvin Carter, II, Craig, Brownfield, Raymond Naylor, Posey, Jones, Zackery Harmon, Angela Jenkins, Dauck, Justine Minor, Mary Mena, Christopher King, Collins, Cooksey, McNew, Cynthia Conway, Antonio Johnson, Anderson, Paula Cowell and Does Parole Board Members |
| 4:2022cv00492 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| James M Moody |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (llg) |
Filing 8
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to #7 Order filed this date, judgment is entered dismissing this case with prejudice; the relief sought is denied. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/21/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER approving and adopting, in its entirety, #4 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; denying #1 Plaintiff's IFP Motion; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice; denying as moot #3 Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and certifying an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. If Plaintiff wishes to continue this case, he be required to submit the statutory filing and administrative fee of $402.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 15 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 07/21/2022. (llg)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations; and directing the Court to mail Plaintiff copies of the docket entries representing the three "strikes" that are referenced in the Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff's objections are due by 07/18/2022. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 06/14/2022. (llg)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to #4 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Brunson Roberts. (llg) |
|
Filing 4
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that: #1 IFP Motion be denied and #2 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice; #3 Motion for Preliminary Injunction be denied as moot; Plaintiff be required to submit the statutory filing and administrative fee of $402.00 to the Clerk, within 15 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case; and that the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith Objections due within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/1/2022. (ldb)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Brunson Roberts. (kdr) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Brunson Roberts.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brunson Roberts. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
