Cases 1 - 10 of 1,926
Elmore v. Cooksie et al
as 4:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Lanika Cooksie, Shelby Huston, John Brazzeale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 5:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Henry Odom
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Odom v. Weese et al
as 5:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Austin Weese, Jimmy Wilson, John Gibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Inc., et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2341
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, RAVINDER SINGH and THOMAS ODOM
Intervenor:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of California, KATRINA HAGEN, in her official capacity as the Acting Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California, NATALIE PALUGYAI, in her official capacity as Secretary of the California Labor Workforce and Development Agency and others
California Trucking Association, et al. v. Bonta, et al.
as 24-2351
Plaintiff:
CALIFORNIA TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, RAVINDER SINGH and THOMAS ODOM
Intervenor:
OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Defendant:
ROB BONTA, KATRINA HAGEN, NATALIE PALUGYAI and others
Odom v. Beard et al
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Glenn D. Odom
Defendant:
Jessica Beard, Damon Preston and Mr. Kenny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. ODOM
as 5:2024cv00111
Petitioner:
ROOSEVELT LEE, JR
Respondent:
ROY ODOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10969
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
