Henderson v. Johnson et al
| Samuel L Henderson |
| L Johnson, Croskete, Drew Matlock, Going, Jennie Patton, Wosby, Dunalin, Correct Care Solutions, Johnson, Keith Waddle, Moore, Ridgle Hightrider, Arkansas Department of Correction and Burls |
| 5:2017cv00028 |
| February 1, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER Adopting 38 Proposed Findings and Recommendations and granting 31 defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's complaint is dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/14/2018. (mcz)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER adopting in all respects 21 the partial recommended disposition; and dismissing with prejudice, defendants Keith Waddle, Moore, Ridgle Hightrider and Burls, because plaintiff Samuel L. Henderson has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/5/2017. (kdr)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER adopting the 6 partial recommended disposition in all respects; and dismissing defendants Arkansas Department of Correction, L. Johnson, Croskete, Matlock, Going, Patton, Wosby, and Dunalin because plaintiff Samuel L. Henderson has failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against them. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/14/2017. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
