Cases 1 - 10 of 3,742
Watson-Buisson v. Cain
as 25-30273
Petitioner:
Jeremy Lee Watson-Buisson
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Malpica v. MDOC et al
as 1:2025cv00128
Plaintiff:
Maximo Malpica
Defendant:
MDOC, Burl Cain, Shawn Hopson and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holliday v. Cain
as 25-60220
Petitioner:
Michael Holliday
Respondent:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Walker v. Cain
as 3:2025cv00287
Plaintiff:
Darrell D. Walker
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bolanos v. Cain et al
as 2:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Bolanos
Defendant:
Burl Cain, MDOC and SMCI
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Webb v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2025cv00285
Plaintiff:
D'Angelo Webb
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Burl Cain
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Cain
as 3:2025cv00125
Petitioner:
Jermaine Neal
Respondent:
Burl Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Douglas v. Cain
as 25-60191
Plaintiff:
William Frederick Douglas
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Commissioner, Mississippi Department of Corrections, Adewale Idowe, Unknown Greene, K-9 Officer and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jordan v. Cain
as 25-60187
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Jordan
Defendant:
Burl Cain, MDOC Commissioner; Official capacity, Brady Sistrunk, Warden of WGCF; Individual capacity and Official capacity, Steven Bell, Individual capacity and Official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
