POWELL v. OWENS et al
| WILLIAM H POWELL |
| BRIAN OWENS, GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN, JAMES HINTON, MOODY, DAVIS, BOBBITT, JOHN DOES, JOHN DOE, PETER EADDIE, RAWLS, ROBINSON, JOHN HILL, STEPHEN BOSTIC, COOK, GEORGIA HEALTH SCIENCE UNIVERSITY, WORTHY, COLETTE NASH, CHIQUITA A FYE, HARRISON, SPIKES, JANE DOE, COOPER, JOHN AND OR JANE DOE and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES |
| 5:2014cv00087 |
| February 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia |
| Macon Office |
| Macon |
| STEPHEN HYLES |
| MARC THOMAS TREADWELL |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER ADOPTING 88 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/23/2018. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER ADOPTING 83 Report and Recommendations and GRANTING 72 Motion for Summary Judgment. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 2/26/2018. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING 75 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 70 Motion for TRO. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/29/2017. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER ADOPTING as amended 64 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 49 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 1/27/2017. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER re 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. The Court refers the matter back to the Magistrate Judge for consideration of the other grounds for dismissal in the Motion to Dismiss as well as reconsideration of whether the Plaintiff's Motions for Entry of Default and Appointment of Counsel are moot. Ordered by US DISTRICT JUDGE MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 6/30/2016. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER DENYING 41 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/29/2014. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER DENYING 32 Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 8/20/2014. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendations and DENYING 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Physician's Assistant Collette Nash, Nurse Harris (or Harrison), Nurse Willis, Nurse Worthy, John Doe #1 black male, and John Doe #2 white male and his First Amendment claims against Counselor Bostic, Counselor Hill, and Lieutenant Rawls are allowed to go forward. The other claims and Defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 7/16/2014. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
13
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint filed by WILLIAM H POWELL, 8 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by WILLIAM H POWELL (); ORDER finding moot 7 MOTION for Leave to File Supplement to Complaint filed by WILLIAM H POWELL, and 11 MOTION for Court to Order Service filed by WILLIAM H POWELL; ORDER Directing Service. Ordered by US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES on 5-28-14. (mpm)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING 10 Motion for Reconsideration. Ordered by U.S. District Judge MARC THOMAS TREADWELL on 5/23/2014. (tlh)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER denying 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; granting 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff is Ordered to pay an initial partial filing fee of $1.51 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. There shall be no service of process until further order. Ordered by US Magistrate Judge STEPHEN HYLES on 3-17-14 (mpm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
