Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Alhorsome v. Macias et al
as 1:2026cv05758
Plaintiff:
Taher Alhorsome
Defendant:
Martha Macias, Derec Walzberg, Dena M. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOOD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2026cv09220
Plaintiff:
KRISTINE WOOD and ESTATE OF SHERYL HARRISON
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Arasokun v. USA
as 3:2026cv00103
Petitioner:
Ayodele Harrison Arasokun
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2026cv03361
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
HARRISON v. BISIGNANO
as 1:2026cv00709
Plaintiff:
TERRY LAMAR HARRISON
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Marchese-Santos v. Central Office of VT et al
as 2:2026cv00247
Defendant:
Saunders, Central Office of VT, CimPA and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Marchese-Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shelton (PS) v. Fitzgerald et al
as 1:2026cv03304
Plaintiff:
Mark Shelton
Defendant:
Mark Fitzgerald, Anita Whitehead, Stefani Dills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
West v. Meta Platforms
as 1:2026cv00116
Plaintiff:
Alexander Harrison West
Defendant:
Meta Platforms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
