Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-1997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
THOMAS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ASSISTANCE OFFICE et al
as 2:2026cv05133
Petitioner:
ASIA THOMAS
Respondent:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY ASSISTANCE OFFICE, LISA CAMPS and EDWARD MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BLUE v. VOIGTSCHILD et al
as 2:2026cv00499
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
M. VOIGTSCHILD, K. FISCHER, J. PIRTLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley v. Nash et al
as 4:2026cv00726
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ashley
Defendant:
Rick D Nash, Kristine G Baker, D P Marshall, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doss v. Nash et al
as 4:2026cv00707
Plaintiff:
Joe A Doss, Jr
Defendant:
Rick D Nash, Kristine G Baker, D P Marshall, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Nash et al
as 4:2026cv00706
Plaintiff:
Quamirrio Edwards
Defendant:
Rick D Nash, Kristine G Baker, D P Marshall, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Consumer Portfolio Services Inc.
as 6:2026cv01509
Plaintiff:
Tawanna Moody
Defendant:
Consumer Portfolio Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Barnett v. Hancock et al
as 1:2026cv00169
Plaintiff:
Dewey A. Barnett
Defendant:
Gregory Hancock and Unknown Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noriega v. State Of Florida et al
as 8:2026cv01986
Plaintiff:
John Noriega and JJ Handman LLC
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Falkenberg Jail Road, Jerry Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Hancock et al
as 1:2026cv00163
Plaintiff:
Dewey A Barnett
Defendant:
Gregory Hancock and Unknown Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
