Cases 1 - 10 of 35,579
Cooke et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2025cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cooke, Charles Farrior, Terry Harris and others
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, Omar I Abdullah and Rishar P. Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv05264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Booker v. Davis et al
as 1:2025cv05282
Plaintiff:
Gregory Booker
Defendant:
Det. DeWayne Davis, City Of Chicago and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Village of Lansing et al
as 1:2025cv05236
Petitioner:
Keimon Crayton
Respondent:
Village of Lansing, John Doe and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv05404
Plaintiff:
Jason C Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Greer, III v. Thompson et al
as 1:2025cv05238
Plaintiff:
Raymond Greer, III
Defendant:
Thompson, RTU Staff, Tom Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crayton v. Village of Lansing et al
as 1:2025cv01181
Plaintiff:
Keimon Crayton
Defendant:
Village of Lansing, John Doe and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(SS) Cook v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2025cv00557
Plaintiff:
Tim Leavell Cook
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Cook
as 6:2025cv00197
Plaintiff:
Everett James Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coon v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 1:2025cv11277
Plaintiff:
Diane Coon
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Group Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
