Cases 1 - 10 of 3,858
Bates v. Morris et al
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Daris Bates
Defendant:
Jalen Morris and Kayvionne Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lim v. New York State Board of Law Examiners et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
New York State Board of Law Examiners, City of Chicago, Illinois, Lucien Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schochenmaier v. Gomez et al
as 5:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schochenmaier
Defendant:
John Gomez, Jorge Esparza, Juan Galindo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01685
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Chennells v. Curran et al
as 6:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Chennells
Defendant:
Michael J. Curran, Edward Haynes, Will Devin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarzembowski v. Cook County Jail
as 1:2024cv03584
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Jarzembowski
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
MACDONALD v. JOHNSON et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
KINLEY MACDONALD
Defendant:
DANIEL JOHNSON, BRUCE KILE, BOARD OF OVERSEERS OF THE BAR and others
Not Yet Classified:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Cooper v. City of Opa Locka et al
as 1:2024cv21524
Plaintiff:
Marc Cooper
Defendant:
City of Opa Locka and John Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
