Wells v. Ward et al
| Jeremy John Wells |
| Commissioner Timothy Ward, Warden Brooks Benton, Z. Jones, FNU Fletcher, Sergeant FNU Arthur, Name Unknown, Timothy Bell, Warden Edward Philbin, Clifford Brown, FNU Young, FNU Shelton, FNU Harvey and Classification Committee |
| 4:2021cv00256 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| William T Moore |
| Christopher L Ray |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Jeremy John Wells. (loh) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT by Prisoner Jeremy John Wells to collection of fees. (loh) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting re #3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff must return both the Prisoner Trust Account Statement and the Consent to Collection of Fees from Trust Account to the Clerk within fourteen days of the date this Order is served. PLRA due by 10/12/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher L. Ray on 9/28/21. (loh)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeremy John Wells. REFERRED to Judge Christopher L. Ray.(wwp) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Filing Fee Deficiency. Compliance due by 10/4/2021. (maa) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jeremy John Wells.(maa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
