Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Thompson v. Severt et al
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Shannon Thompson
Defendant:
Sean Severt, Officer Earl Leftwich, Patrolman Z. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KOFFLER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00292
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROBERT KOFFLER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN BEN FORD, NICHOLAS STRICKLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koffler v. Ward et al
as 2:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
John Robert Koffler
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Warden Ben Ford, Nicholas Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOOLSBY v. JUDKINS et al
as 4:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
JASON RICHARD GOOLSBY
Defendant:
Judkins, SGT Stone, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GOOLSBY v. JUDKINS et al
as 5:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
JASON RICHARD GOOLSBY
Defendant:
SGT JUDKINS, OFFICER STONE, UNKNOWN OFFICER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KYMBER CONSULTING GROUP, LLC et al v. CATO
as 1:2022cv01042
Plaintiff:
KYMBER CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, DARA Z JONES and DARA Z. JONES
Defendant:
KYMBER M CATO and KYMBER M. CATO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Baird v. Benton et al
as 4:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Marty Lamar Baird
Defendant:
Warden Brooks Benton, Z. Jones, Betterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSS v. BOGER et al
as 1:2021cv00932
Plaintiff:
GERMINIQUE STEPHON ROSS
Defendant:
J.C. BOGER, J.H. PRISK, Z. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. BOGER et al
as 1:2021cv00837
Plaintiff:
GERMINIQUE S. ROSS
Defendant:
J. C. BOGER, J. H. PRISK, Z. JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John Wells
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy Ward, Warden Brooks Benton, Z. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
