SANTAIS v. CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
| YVES SANTAIS |
| Corrections Corporation of America, Coffee Correctional Facility, Hilton Hall and Jones |
| 5:2016cv00080 |
| July 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Waycross Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| R. Stan Baker |
| Lisa G. Wood |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER making the 93 USCA Mandate the judgment of this court. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 12/3/2020. (ca)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER ADOPTING 42 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge as the opinion of the Court and DENIES Defendant's 28 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment excessive force claim and state law claims of battery, false imprisonment, and intentional infliction of emotional distress remain before the Court. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/28/2018. (ca)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER ADOPTING 40 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, and DENIES Plaintiff's 38 Motion for Preliminary Injunction for Law Library Access Time. Signed by Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/6/2018. (ca)
|
|
Filing
40
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DENY Plaintiff's 38 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction for Law Library Access Time. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation to file specifi c written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/26/2018. (ca)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 20 Report and Recommendations of the Magistrate Judge, as amended herein, as the opinion of the Court. The Court SUSTAINS in part and OVERRULES in part Plaintiff's Objections. The Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Corrections Corporation of America, Coffee Correctional Facility, and Warden Hall, as well as Plaintiff's deliberate indifference claims. The Court DENIES Plaintiff's 14 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. However, Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for excessive force against Defendant Jones, including his claims for compensatory and punitive damages, shall proceed. Signed by Chief Judge Lisa G. Wood on 3/23/2017. (ca)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Correction Corporation of America, ("CCA"), Coffee Correctional Facility, and Warden Hilton Hall. I also RECOMMEND that the Court DISMISS Plaintiff's claims for compensatory and punitive damages indifference claims re 1 Complaint. I further RECOMMEND that the Court DENY Plaintiff's 14 MOTION for Permanent Injunction. The Court ORDERS any party seeking to ob ject to this Report and Recommendation to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered (Objections to R&R due by 2/13/2017). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 1/30/2017. (ca)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER reassigning the 1 Complaint, filed by YVES SANTAIS to the Waycross Division. Civil Number CV516-80. Signed by Magistrate Judge G. R. Smith on 9/12/16. (wwp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
