SNIPES v. ALLEN et al
| RODRECEUS SNIPES |
| Marty Allen and Trevonza Bobbitt |
| 6:2018cv00051 |
| April 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia |
| Statesboro Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| R. Stan Baker |
| J. Randal Hall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER ADOPTING 19 Report and Recommendations, DISMISSING without prejudice Plaintiff's complaint for his failure to prosecute, DENYING Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and CLOSING this case. Signed by Chief Judge J. Randal Hall on 08/03/2018. (maa)
|
|
Filing
19
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the Court DISMISS without prejudice Plaintiff's 1 Complaint, for failure to prosecute. It is further RECOMMENDED that the Court DENY Plaintiff leave to appeal in forma pauperis and DIR ECT the Clerk of Court to enter the appropriate judgment of dismissal and to CLOSE this case. Any party seeking to object to this Report and Recommendation is ordered to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days of the date on which this Report and Recommendation is entered. (Objections to R&R due by 7/23/2018). ORDER directing service of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge R. Stan Baker on 7/9/2018. (csr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Georgia Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
