Cases 1 - 10 of 371
Bowens v. Allen
as 1:2023cv05689
Petitioner:
Rodqucus Bowens and Rodqueus Bowens
Respondent:
Marty Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Davidson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Darrell Leon Davidson, David Michael Martin, Larry James Martin and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Owens v. Whitten
as 22-5106
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARTY ALLEN OWENS
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK WHITTEN
Daker v. Dozier et al
as 6:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Defendant:
Gregory Dozier, Homer Bryson, Timothy Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAKER v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, BRIAN OWENS, HOMER BRYSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 7:2022cv00078
Plaintiff:
LANORRIS MOORE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and MARTY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHEPARD v. ALLEN
as 3:2022cv00060
Petitioner:
RODNEY SHEPARD
Respondent:
MARTY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEPHERD v. SHAVER
as 3:2022cv00055
Petitioner:
RODNEY SHEPHERD, RODNEY SHEPARD and RODNEY G SHEPARD
Respondent:
WARDEN BRIAN SHAVER and MARTY ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shepard v. Allen
as 1:2022cv01992
Petitioner:
Rodney Shepard
Respondent:
Marty Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
