Fisher v. LaPorte County Jail et al
| Paul Fisher |
| LaPorte County Jail, Sheriff, LaPorte County and Inmates |
| 3:2009cv00369 |
| August 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana |
| South Bend Office |
| LaPorte |
| Rudy Lozano |
| Christopher A Nuechterlein |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
93
OPINION AND ORDER: GRANTING 86 Motion to file second amended complaint; GRANTING pltf leave to proceed against defts Hackett and Bell in individual capacities for damages on 14th Amendment claim; DISMISSING all other claims; DISMISSING Defts Sheriff, John Doe and Mike Mollenhauer; DIRECTING USM to effect service of process on Bell and Hackett; ORDERING defts to respond to Second Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 6/17/11. (jld)
|
|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER: DENYING 48 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Sheriff.. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 12/21/10. (jld)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER: Granting pltf leave to proceed against Sheriff Mike Mollenhauer in his official and individual capacities on 14th Amendment claim; DISMISSING defendants LaPorte County; LaPorte County Jail; Jarrett Derrick and Inmates; ORDERING Deft Mollenhauer to answer complaint.. Signed by Judge Rudy Lozano on 1/11/10. (jld)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
