Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Ledford v. Waldo et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Meloday Waldo, LaPorte County Sheriff's Office, LaPorte County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ledford v. Waldo et al
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Ledford
Defendant:
Meloday Waldo, LaPorte County Sheriff's Office, LaPorte County Public Defender's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Niedbalski v. LaPorte County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Lucas A. Niedbalski
Defendant:
LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Laporte County Sheriffs Office et al
as 3:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Bertrell Randle
Defendant:
Laporte County Sheriffs Office and Quality Correctional Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cislo v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00057
Defendant:
Laporte County Sherriff Dept, Ron Heeg, Eric Tchaptchet and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bee Cislo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph James v. Timothy Mace, et al
as 24-1037
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH M. JAMES
Defendant:
TIMOTHY MACE, Corporal Jailer also known as TIMOTHY EARL MACE, DALTON P. PFLUGHAUPT, individual, former employee of Michigan City Civil City, KELLY J. KENNEDY and others
Laura v Whintey et al
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Martell Laura
Defendant:
Whintey, LaPorte County Jail and Ron Heeg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LAURA v. WHINTEY et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
MARTELL LAURA
Defendant:
WHINTEY, LAPORTE COUNTY JAIL and RON HEEG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
