PURVIS v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
| WILLARD PURVIS |
| ARNOLD, BARNETT, BROWN, DONALDSON, DUGAN, MR. GILMORE, MRS. GILMORE, GILSTRAP, GRAY, HENDERSHOT, HINTON, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, LEDFORD, LEMMONS, LINNEWEBER, LITTLEJOHN, MARSHALL, MURDOCK, NICHOLSON, PURCELL, ROBERTSON, SEAVERS, SNIDER, SPRAY, UNKNOWN SECURE HOUSING UNIT CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS, WELLS and WILLIS |
| 2:2014cv00041 |
| February 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Terre Haute Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| William G. Hussmann |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
86
Entry Granting Motion for Partial Summary Judgment - Plaintiff Willard Purvis is an inmate at the Wabash Valley Correctional Facility ("Wabash Valley"). He brings this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983, alleging that the defendants viola ted his constitutional rights in a number of ways. Arguing that Purvis failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies with respect to his claims that Lt. Nicholson issued a report of conduct against him in retaliation for his filing of gr ievances and that his Eighth Amendment rights were violated by Defendants Mr. and Mrs. Gilmore and Mr. Donaldson when he was improperly assigned to an upper floor. Purvis has not responded to the motion for summary judgment. For the following re asons, the Court finds that the motion 76 must be granted. Purvis's claim that Lt. Nicholson issued a report of conduct against him in retaliation for his filing of grievances and his claim that Mr. and Mrs. Gilmore and Mr. Donaldson violat ed his constitutional rights when he was improperly assigned to an upper floor are dismissed without prejudice. No partial final judgment shall issue a s to the claims resolved in this Entry. An order directing further proceedings in this action shall issue separately. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/21/2016. (RSF)
|
|
Filing
50
ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - In the Entry of May 7, 2015, the Court screened the plaintiff's complaint and identified claims that must proceed in separate lawsuits. The plaintiff was directed to notify the Court whether he wished the claims to proceed in separate lawsuits as described in that Entry. All defendants other than Mr. Brown, Mr. Gilmore, Mrs. Gilmore, Lt. Nicholson, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Leohr, and Mr. Donaldson are dismissed from this action. If the plaint iff wishes for any other claims to proceed that were not addressed in this Entry, he shall have through October 20, 2015, in which to so notify the Court. The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) (3) to issue process to defendants M r. Brown, Mr. Gilmore, Mrs. Gilmore, Lt. Nicholson, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Leohr, and Mr. Donaldson in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). (See Entry.) Copies distributed pursuant to distribution list. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 9/24/2015.(RSF)
|
|
Filing
41
ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The plaintiff shall have through June 11, 2015, in which to notify the Court of the following: (1) whether he believes he has asserted any claim in his Amended Complaint which has not been discussed in this Ent ry; (2) which of the claims identified in Part II of this Entry he wishes to proceed in this action; and (3) whether he wishes the remaining claims to be severed into separate lawsuits. **SEE ENTRY** Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 5/7/2015.(AH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
