Cases 1 - 10 of 839
Littlejohn v. Becton Dickinson and Company et al
as 2:2024cv02742
Defendant:
Becton Dickinson and Company, Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated, C R Bard Incorporated and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Dequita Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grizzle v. Martin
as 24-40670
Defendant:
Stephen Martin, Martin Cleveland, Mark Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Grizzle
Littlejohn v. AFAM Concept Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv09363
Defendant:
SoftSheen-Carson LLC,, Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Loreal and others
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Littlejohn v. Quick, et al
as 24-6203
Defendant:
STEVEN HARPE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Oklahoma Department of Correctionss and CHRISTE QUICK, in her official capacity as Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Plaintiff:
MANUEL LITTLEJOHN
Littlejohn v. Quick et al
as 5:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
Manuel Littlejohn
Defendant:
Christe Quick and Steven Harpe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Byrd v. Brittnee Smith, et al
as 24-2663
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BYRD
Defendant:
FRANK LITTLEJOHN, DANITA REED, THOMAS WELLINGTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beverly et al v. Erich et al
as 1:2024cv07948
Plaintiff:
Jilian Stillwell, Deja Green and Rachel Beverly
Defendant:
Tamara Littlejohn, Christina Erich and Chicago Board Of Education
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv04579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
