Cases 1 - 10 of 100
JONES v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2026cv01924
Plaintiff:
AUDRAIN JONES
Defendant:
LLOYD ARNOLD, TRENT ALLEN, COLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv01193
Plaintiff:
Vicki Arnold
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Gooden v. Liebel et al
as 3:2026cv01374
Plaintiff:
Ivan Gooden
Defendant:
David Liebel, Lloyd Arnold and Ron Neal
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
West v. Liebel et al
as 3:2026cv01376
Plaintiff:
Antonio West
Defendant:
David Liebel, Lloyd Arnold and Ron Neal
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv01144
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arnold v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv06045
Plaintiff:
Frank Raymond Arnold
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Arnold
as 3:2026cv00695
Plaintiff:
Larry Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Subin Associates, LLP
as 26-2558
Defendant:
JORGE LUPI, SUBIN ASSOCIATES, LLP, SUBIN & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
:
UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, JASON M. GALLINA, M.D. and JASON M. GALLINA, M.D. PC
Arnold v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2026cv00383
Plaintiff:
Nathan Arnold
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv02475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
