Cases 1 - 10 of 238
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Yealy et al
as 4:2023cv04114
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lemorn Arnold
Defendant:
Officer Yearly, Officer Hall, Nurse Leslie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Weaver et al
as 3:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arnold and Matthew Christopher Arnold
Defendant:
Tim Weaver and Eric Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Bray
as 3:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arnold and Matthew Christopher Arnold
Defendant:
Eric Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold v. Fulton County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Matthew Arnold and Matthew Christopher Arnold
Defendant:
Fulton County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Escovedo v. Arnold et al
as 2:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
John Escovedo
Defendant:
Pearcy Arnold and Tommy Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meraz v. Payne et al
as 2:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Jerome Meraz
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Christopher Budnik, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Earls et al
as 4:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Michael Phillips
Defendant:
Earls, Lewis and Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cogburn v. Arkansas Department of Corrections
as 4:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kevin Cogburn
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Linda Arnold and Jarius Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
