SAVAGE et al v. MILLS
| LINDSEY CROSBY, KARL WARD, DR JOHN HERZOG, JO BOSHOLD, JAMES FAHEY, MIKE MERCER, LEE ANN DELCOURT, DAVID JONES, RAYMOND BOSHOLD and ARTHUR LANGLEY |
| JANET T MILLS |
| 1:2020cv00165 |
| May 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maine |
| JOHN H RICH |
| LANCE E WALKER |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to JANET T MILLS. Counsel shall print the embossed summons and effect service in the manner in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. Note-If you are using Version 6 of Adobe Acrobat, be sure the PRINT WHAT field is set to DOCUMENTS AND COMMENTS (Click File, then Print to check this setting). (mnd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (mnd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against JANET T MILLS with Jury Demand filed by LEE ANN DELCOURT, RAYMOND BOSHOLD, JO BOSHOLD, LINDSEY CROSBY, DAVID JONES, ARTHUR LANGLEY, JAMES FAHEY, MIKE MERCER, JOHN HERZOG and KARL WARD. PAYMENT OF FILING FEE DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. IF FILING FEE IS BEING PAID WITH A CREDIT CARD COUNSEL ARE INSTRUCTED TO LOGIN TO CMECF AND DOCKET Case Opening Filing Fee Paid FOUND IN THE Complaints and Other Initiating Documents CATEGORY. CHECK PAYMENTS DUE WITHIN 48 HOURS. (Service of Process Deadline 8/6/2020) Fee due by 5/11/2020.(mnd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maine District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
