Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
Petitioner: David Kelly
Respondent: State of Maryland and Maryland Attorney General
Case Number: 1:2023cv01104
Filed: May 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: James K Bredar
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 22, 2023 Filing 8 MOTION to Seal by Maryland Attorney General, State of Maryland (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
June 22, 2023 Filing 7 -SEALED - NOTICE of Filing Under Seal by Maryland Attorney General, State of Maryland re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #6 Response to Habeas Petition (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Record, #2 Exhibit Transcript 11-14-2019, #3 Exhibit Transcript 01-13-2020, #4 Exhibit Transcript 03-23-2020, #5 Exhibit Transcript 04-03-2020, #6 Exhibit Transcript 05-11-2020, #7 Exhibit Transcript 09-17-2020, #8 Exhibit Transcript 12-04-2020, #9 Exhibit Transcript 02-26-2021, #10 Exhibit Transcript 06-04-2021, #11 Exhibit Transcript 07-01-2021, #12 Exhibit Transcript 07-20-2021, #13 Exhibit Transcript 07-21-2021, #14 Exhibit Transcript 07-22-2021, #15 Exhibit Transcript 07-23-2021, #16 Exhibit Transcript 07-26-2021, #17 Exhibit Transcript 07-27-2021, #18 Exhibit Transcript 12-15-2021)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
June 22, 2023 Filing 6 RESPONSE to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Maryland Attorney General, State of Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Filing Exhibit or Attachment Under Seal)(DiMiceli, Andrew)
May 18, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew DiMiceli on behalf of Maryland Attorney General, State of Maryland (DiMiceli, Andrew)
May 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing the Respondents to file an Answer to the Petition on or before 40 days. Signed by Chief Judge James K. Bredar on 5/15/2023. (c/m P and c/em AG 5/15/2023 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
May 9, 2023 Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to David Kelly. (c/m P 5/9/2023 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
May 5, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Kelly(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
May 5, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by David Kelly. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: David Kelly
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: State of Maryland
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Maryland Attorney General
Represented By: Andrew DiMiceli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?