Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rempel v. Gore et al
as 1:2026cv00683
Defendant:
John Crider, David Kelly, Daniel Arobogast and others
Plaintiff:
Austin F. Rempel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rempel v. Gore et al
as 2:2026cv00683
Plaintiff:
Austin Rempel
Defendant:
Charles Gore, Ken Whitlow, Matthew Kimbelton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Northern Regional Jail et al
as 5:2026cv00195
Plaintiff:
Jerald Star Martinez
Defendant:
Northern Regional Jail, Genesis Healthcare, Misty Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Runyon v. Hunter et al
as 2:2026cv00675
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Runyon
Defendant:
Thomas Hunter, Matthew Ranson, David Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOTTS et al v. KELLY et al
as 2:2026cv11047
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY KNOTTS and ELLEN HEINE
Defendant:
DAVID KELLY, JIM JUSTICE, MARK PLANTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aron Freeland v. David Kelly
as 26-6842
Petitioner:
ARON J. FREELAND
Respondent:
DAVID KELLY, Commissioner WVDCR
Hughes v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 5:2026cv00142
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Hughes
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Dr. David Allen Proctor D.O., Mr. Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windett v. Viapath et al
as 3:2026cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey James Windett
Defendant:
Viapath and David Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeland v. Kelly
as 5:2026cv00103
Petitioner:
Aron Freeland
Respondent:
David Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeland v. Kelly
as 2:2026cv00311
Petitioner:
Aron Freeland
Respondent:
David Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
