Rahman v. Nines et al
Raheem Rahman |
J. Nines, Tames, Yes Care, B. Mace, Breaves and Judy |
1:2023cv03260 |
November 30, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Julie Rebecca Rubin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER Denying #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; Denying #4 Motion for Order to Show Cause; Denying #4 Motion for TRO; Denying #7 Motion to Appoint Counsel; Directing the Finance Officer to file an inmate account summary information sheet within 21 days. Signed by Judge Julie Rebecca Rubin on 1/11/2024. (c/m 1/12/2024 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Raheem Rahman (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Raheem Rahman(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 New Case Notification Letter sent to Raheem Rahman. (c/m 12/01/2023 bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Order to Show Cause, MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Raheem Rahman(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Raheem Rahman(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Raheem Rahman(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Breaves, Judy, B. Mace, J. Nines, Tames, Yes Care, filed by Raheem Rahman. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Affidavit, #3 Envelope)(bas, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.