Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rahman v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Raheem Rahman
Defendant:
J. Nines, Tames, Yes Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Rhodes v. Nines et al
as 1:2022cv02621
Petitioner:
William Rhodes and William Rose
Respondent:
J. Nines and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aurel v. Dietary North Branch C. Institution et al
as 1:2022cv02317
Plaintiff:
Mich Aurel
Defendant:
Dietary North Branch C. Institution, Warden J. Nines, F. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. D.O.C. Security Operations et al
as 1:2022cv01815
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reginald Walker
Defendant:
D.O.C. Security Operations, Secretary of DPSCS, Executive Director Inmate Grievance Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome McBride v. J. Most
as 21-6302
Defendant / Appellee:
W. MULLER, SGT. JANET M. PUFFENBERGER, DAYENA CORCORAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEROME MCBRIDE
Richard Moise v. Warden
as 19-6432
Defendant / Appellee:
WHITEMAN, J. NINES, G. SINDY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD D. MOISE
Lewis Sr. v. Bishop et al
as 8:2018cv03616
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Lewis Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Frank Bishop, Medical RN Holly L. Pierce and Asst. Warden J. Nines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Corcoran et al
as 8:2018cv03149
Defendant:
Dayena M. Corcoran, C. Gilpin, Tammy and others
Plaintiff:
William K. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Moise v. Warden
as 1:2018cv02678
Defendant:
Warden, Lt. Whiteman, K. Lamp and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Moise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Dixon v. Hill-Peay et al
as 8:2018cv01023
Plaintiff:
William K Dixon
Defendant:
K. Hill-Peay, J. Nines, K. Lamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
