Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Nathaniel Williams v. Yes Care Corp.
as 24-6333
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
YES CARE CORP., SARAH JOHNSON, RN, DR. CLEM, M.D. and others
Passero v. Yes Care
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory Passero
Defendant:
Yes Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Maynard v. Yes Care Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Davon Alexander Maynard
Defendant:
Yes Care Corp., Janet Mijere, Bolaji Onabajo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, et al
as 1:2024cv00715
Defendant:
Yes Care Client Services, Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services, Corizon Medical and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Ernest Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Barela v. Yes Care et al
as 2:2024cv00049
Defendant:
Yes Care Doctor, Yes Care Nurse, Yes Care and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Richard Barela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOSTER v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY et al
as 5:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
BRYAN ERNEST FOSTER
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, YES CARE CLIENT SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia-Ramos v. Medical Director John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Abraham Garcia-Ramos
Defendant:
Medical Director John Doe and Yes Care Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlton v. Weber et al
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
David L. Carlton
Defendant:
Shane Weber, Bradley Butler, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Goines v. Yes Care Corporation
as 1:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Derrell L. Goines
Defendant:
Yes Care Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hampton v. Yes-Care
as 1:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Sashim M. Hampton
Defendant:
Yes-Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
